Community Development

NSOP 2012 Crew Chief Contract

Congratulations on being selected as one of the 2012 New Student Orientation Program’s Crew Chiefs. You are the front line in interacting with the new orientation leaders, so your role is very important in helping manage the overall staffing during NSOP. Due to this, Crew Chiefs are responsible for the following:

If there are any special circumstances, please fill out the comments section below.
Departments: 

Clone of Club Recharge Evaluation

TBD

Year in school (example: 2012, 2015 or graduate student, etc)
School you are attending (example: CC, SEAS undergrad/graduate, GS, Barnard or name of graduate school)
What is your role within your organization?
How many previous years (NOT including 2011-12) of experience do you have on an SGB/IGB/ABC group executive board at CU?
Directions
Please provide honest and thoughtful feedback; your insight into what student leaders need and how we can make these events work better for you is critical for healthy organizations and successful programs on campus. Please be as thorough as you can – we really do listen and incorporate this feedback on future events! Please rate different aspects of the Club Recharge sessions that you attended by clicking on the corresponding headers below. Please only rate the workshops sessions that you attended. If you did not attend a particular workshop, just skip that area. In the comments section for each workshop, please add any additional information about your ratings (especially suggestions if you gave a low rating) or any questions or suggestions about the workshop in general.
The Program is Right
This session served its function as a welcome and starting point for the day.
The time allotted was appropriate for the amount of information covered.
The program served to frame the remainder of the day.
The text-in feature made the program interactive and engaging.
This session introduced me to who my advisor is and what s/he does.
Given my learning style, the workshop was structured in a way that allowed me to learn.
First Advisor Session
The time allotted was appropriate for the amount of information covered.
The information given in the workshop was useful in a practical sense.
This workshop set the tone and expectations for the day.
This workshop helped clarify my advisor's role and expectations of her/him.
This workshop helped clarify my role and my advisor's expectations of me.
Second Advisor Session
The time allotted was appropriate for the amount of information covered.
The information given in the workshop was useful in a practical sense.
This workshop helped debrief the case studies that we worked on throughout the day.
This session helped wrap up the day and answer any final questions.
Overall
Please rate your overall experience with Club Recharge.
The communication I received informing me about Club Recharge was adequate.
The registration process was clear and effective.
The workshops that were offered covered the necessary topics for performing my role well.
Club Recharge was a safe space where I could ask questions and contribute my opinion and experiences.
I was physically comfortable in the workshop spaces.
The format and schedule of the day were appropriate for allowing access to the information covered.
Division of Responsibilities
Did you need to divide up the day among different members of your group? If so, what was your plan to divide up the day and/or how did you coordinate this with your group members?
Format
How did the day-long format work for you? Would different formats work better (2 evening sessions, for example)? If so, what format(s) would you propose? Why?
Attendance
How could Community Development increase attendance at Club Recharge?
Case Study Overall
How did the case study process work for you? Did you like that it determined what workshops you would attend? If not, which workshops would you have chosen to attend instead?
Case Study Accuracy
Did you identify with the case study as an accurate reflection of a situation that you are likely to encounter in your programming? Why or why not? What, if anything, should we change?
Case Study Usefulness
Did the case study help you clarify what knowledge you were lacking in order to fulfill your executive role effectively?
Second Advisor Session
Did you stay for the second advisor session? If not, why and what would have made you stay longer? What can we do to ensure student leaders stay for the full duration of Club Recharge?
Necessary information
Was there anything you need to know to run your organization that was not addressed during the day? If so, what? What are you ideas on how/where to include this info? Do you think you would have gained this information if you had attended different workshop sessions?
Most helpful
What was the most helpful part of the day? Why?
Areas for improvement
Are there any parts of Club Recharge that you felt were unnecessary or redundant? Which parts and why do you feel that way? How can we improve these particular pieces?
Institutional memory
How are you going to incorporate the information you gained at Club Recharge in to your institutional memory (that is, how are you going to make sure that this important stuff is passed on from member to member from year to year)?
Student-led
How can we make Club Recharge more student-led and/or incorporate your voice more in the design and facilitation of the day? Would you want to be involved in putting on Club Recharge? (No, that’s not binding [remember, this is anonymous!], it’s just to gauge if students would be interested in having a higher level of involvement in general.)
Thank you!
Your feedback is invaluable in constantly improving our trainings and events. Thank you for your time and dedication!
Departments: 

ASB NYC Performing Arts Evaluation

Thank you all for your participation in the first Alternative Spring Break: NYC Performing Arts.  Please take a few minutes to complete the following survey as it will greatly help us in further developing this program.

 

Strongly AgreeAgreeNeither Agree Nor DisagreeDisagreeStrongly Disagree
1. The ASB Program introduced me to new artists
2. The ASB Program provided me a much deeper sense of how artists make work
3. The ASB Program broadened my understanding of the performing arts
4. The ASB Program helped me to understand how dance, music and theater are interrelated
5. The ASB Program demystified the process of creating high level performance events
6. The ASB Program provided me useful tools as I continue my work in the performing arts (on campus and beyond)
7. The ASB Program provided me resources to make decisions about career choices within the performing arts
8. I developed close relationships with some of my fellow ASB students
9. I plan on finding ways to continue to work with my ASB colleagues
10. I plan to continue exploring performing arts events in NYC
11. The group discussions were an important part of the week in terms of providing opportunities to process what I saw/experienced
12. The events of the ASB demonstrated the power of the communal experience which the performing arts can have
13. The ASB Program helped me to understand better the way in which the Performing Arts can illuminate the human experience by confronting difficult/complex issues
12345Did not participate
1. BAM Harvey Tour
2. Conversation with Judy Jamison and Garth Fagan
3. Rehearsal viewing of Nora Chipaumire and Okwui Okpokwasili
4. Warhorse
5. Alumni Career Panel
6. Paul Zimet/Ellen Maddow Workshop
7. Noa and Mira Awad Performance
8. David Diamond Career Coaching for Artists Workshop
9. Nora Chipaumire and Okwui Okpokwasili Performance & Talk Back
10. Hot Lunch Apostles/Talking Band Performance
11. Performance Mix Festival at Joyce Soho
12. Workshop with Scott Blumenthal and Aaron Meicht from OZET
13. Alarm Will Sound Concert & Talkback
14. Closing Dinner Discussion (and two other discussions during the week)
Too FewJust RightToo Many
1. The number of performances we saw was:
2. The number of Workshops/Panels/Talk Backs in which we participated was:
3. The number of discussions we had was:
Departments: 

5-Star Funding for Inter/National Leadership Conference

Please complete this form by April 15, 2014 to be eligible for leadership conference funding. Funding is provided for up to $250.

Section 1: Conference Information
MM/DD/YYYY - MM/DD/YYYY
Section 2: Financial Information
Departments: 

ALPHA Standards of Excellence

The purpose of the ALPHA Standards of Excellence Program is to enhance the values, beliefs and practices of Fraternity and Sorority Life at Columbia University and recognize the accomplishments of

Semester Forms

These required semester recogntion forms should be submitted by the end of the first week of classes each semester. Please read all information carefully.

Chapter Semester Form and Roster

Please fill out the required semesterly chapter information, and upload the appropriate Chapter Roster to this form. Email submissions will not be accepted.

Section 1: Organization
Name of your Inter/National Organization
(e.g. Nu Xi)
(if applicable)
Section 2: Finances
Section 3: Recruitment
If yes, please answer the following questions.
MM/DD/YYYY
MM/DD/YYYY
MM/DD/YYYY
MM/DD/YYYY
MM/DD/YYYY
Section 4: Membership
Please give exact numbers.
If your chapter does not have Barnard members please submit "0". If members are in a joint program please indicate in the "joint program" section. For example, BG/JTS.
If your chapter does not have CC members please sumbit "0".
If your chapter does not have GS members please submit "0". If members are in a joint program please indicate in the "joint program" section.
If your chapter does not have SEAS members please submit "0". If members are in a joint program please indicate in the "joint program" section.
If your chapter does not have members in a joint program please submit "0". Please indicate number and joint program". Example: 3 BC/JTS, 4 GS/JTS.
Including new, active, and inactive members
Section 5: Advisory Board/Alumni Support
Section 6: Chapter Awards
Has your chapter won any awards from your inter/national organization in the past year?
Format: Award Name (Date Received). Separate awards by semicolons (;)
Section 7:Roster Upload
Please submit completed roster in proper format.
Roster must be in excel.
Departments: 

Wendell Nominee Statement

You have been nominated by your academic department’s faculty to receive the George Vincent Wendell Memorial Medal. The Wendell Medal is awarded each year to one Columbia Engineering graduating student who is deemed to merit special recognition because of his or her outstanding character, scholarship, and service to the community.

Brownstone Review Committee Application

The goal of the Brownstone Review Committee is to oversee a fair review process that will determine which groups will reside in the 536, 542, and 546 brownstones located on 114th Street.

Departments: 

Pages

Subscribe to Community Development

Community Development

Visit

510-515 Alfred Lerner Hall
2920 Broadway
New York, NY 10027

Call: (212) 854-3612

Fax: (212) 854-9801

Office Hours
MondayFriday
9:00 a.m.5:00 p.m.